The peer review process is at the heart of the success of scientific publishing. Editorial Institution of Wroc³aw Board of Scientific
Technical Societies Federation has a obligation to assist in all aspects of publishing ethics, especially in cases of plagiarism or duplicate submision.
We record all the mentioned above situations and inform about such cases particular institutions (scientific associations, editors associations etc.
The procedure for reviewing papers for our quarterlies is consistent
with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education,
described in the booklet "Good practice in reviewing procedures in science"
published by the MS&HE (Warsaw 2011).
It based also on rules presented by Elsevier on his website.
The rules of review (details)
Form of review
Reviewer's Statement
List of Reviewers 2011
List of Reviewers 2012
List of Reviewers 2013
List of Reviewers 2014
List of Reviewers 2015
List of Reviewers 2016
List of Reviewers 2017
|