Naczelna Organizacja Techniczna

  Publishing House



  Intern. Editorial Board

  Publication ethics and    malpractice statement


  Articles waiting for print

  Publication fee

  Guidelines for authors

  The rules of review

  Previous numbers

  Publishing information


  +48 71 320-27-03

  +48 608-056-196

  send e-mail

The rules of paper review

The peer review process is at the heart of the success of scientific publishing. Editorial Institution of Wroc³aw Board of Scientific Technical Societies Federation has a obligation to assist in all aspects of publishing ethics, especially in cases of plagiarism or duplicate submision. We record all the mentioned above situations and inform about such cases particular institutions (scientific associations, editors associations etc.

The procedure for reviewing papers for our quarterlies is consistent with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, described in the booklet "Good practice in reviewing procedures in science" published by the MS&HE (Warsaw 2011). It based also on rules presented by Elsevier on his website.

The rules of review (details)

Form of review

Reviewer's Statement

List of Reviewers 2011

List of Reviewers 2012

List of Reviewers 2013

List of Reviewers 2014

List of Reviewers 2015

List of Reviewers 2016

List of Reviewers 2017


© 2013 Wroc³awska Rada Federacji Stowarzyszeń Naukowo-Technicznych NOT